| |
Prosecutor of Trump Foes Resigns 09/11 06:12
WASHINGTON (AP) -- An ally of President Donald Trump said Thursday that he
has resigned from his post leading a Justice Department investigation into
whether former law enforcement and intelligence officials conspired against the
Republican president.
The departure of Joe diGenova injects instant tumult into an investigation
targeting former government officials who have scrutinized Trump over the last
decade, including in connection with Russian interference in the 2016
presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his
Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
"I did in fact resign," diGenova told The Associated Press, calling it an
"honor and a privilege" to serve Trump and the Justice Department.
Though diGenova declined to comment to the AP on the circumstances of his
resignation, a person familiar with the matter who insisted on anonymity to
discuss a personnel decision said the departure came amid mounting frustration
from the Justice Department and White House over the pace and management of the
probe.
In an interview later with The New York Post, diGenova responded to
criticism of his management of the investigation by saying, "If you want
indictments where there's no evidence, you have an ethical problem."
When reached again by the AP, diGenova said the comments were taken out of
context, adding: "There's plenty of evidence in all of these cases to prove the
theories of prosecution. It just takes time to get there, and some people want
to get there a little faster than others -- and you can't do that."
The investigation has always been something of a tall order, aiming to
present separate and unrelated inquiries of the president as part an anti-Trump
conspiracy by law enforcement and intelligence professionals. Though promoted
by the White House, and seized on by Trump supporters looking for
accountability against what they see as "deep state" intelligence community
actors, the conspiracy investigation has proceeded in fits and starts since its
inception a year ago.
The 81-year-old diGenova served as the U.S. attorney for the District of
Columbia during the Reagan administration and for years has been a prominent
Trump ally, including backing his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss
and publicly and repeatedly claiming that the president was the victim of an
intelligence community conspiracy.
He was brought back to the Justice Department in April and given the reins
of the loosely defined investigation.
Five months later, no charges have been brought and it remains unclear
whether any will be, or what information has been gathered to support any basis
for the idea of a plot against Trump by the government officials who
investigated him.
Investigators have sought interviews related to the 2022 FBI search that
recovered classified documents from Mar-a-Lago and have also focused intensely
on one of Trump's chief grievances: a U.S. intelligence community assessment
that Russia interfered on his behalf in the 2016 presidential election. The
assessment has long infuriated the president, along with a Justice Department
special counsel investigation into Russian election interference that shadowed
him during his first term.
That special counsel investigation identified widespread Russian
interference in the election but did not find evidence to prove a criminal
conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign. Multiple other government
inquiries, including by the Justice Department inspector general, have
identified significant errors and omissions in the FBI's handling of the
Trump-Russia probe but did not find evidence of criminal conduct by senior law
enforcement officials.
The yearlong conspiracy investigation has hit stumbles before. Last April, a
lead national security prosecutor in the investigation of former CIA Director
John Brennan was replaced on the team after raising questions about the
strength of the case. Days later, diGenova was sworn in.
Brennan has been investigated on allegations that he lied to Congress about
the creation of the intelligence community assessment, which he and his lawyers
have vigorously denied. In July, he sued the Justice Department for a court
order requiring the preservation of all records from the investigation,
forecasting plans to challenge any potential indictment of him on vindictive
prosecution grounds.
|
|